↓ Skip to main content

Prevention and treatment of biofilms by hybrid- and nanotechnologies

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
11 patents

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Prevention and treatment of biofilms by hybrid- and nanotechnologies
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, August 2013
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s44100
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Bacteria growing as adherent biofilms are difficult to treat and frequently develop resistance to antimicrobial agents. To counter biofilms, various approaches, including prevention of bacterial surface adherence, application of device applicators, and assimilation of antimicrobials in targeted drug delivery machinery, have been utilized. These methods are also combined to achieve synergistic bacterial killing. This review discusses various multimodal technologies, presents general concepts, and describes therapies relying on the principles of electrical energy, ultrasound, photodynamics, and targeted drug delivery for prevention and treatment of biofilms.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
India 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 121 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Other 6 5%
Other 29 23%
Unknown 23 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 10%
Chemistry 10 8%
Engineering 7 6%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 29 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2024.
All research outputs
#7,430,186
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#824
of 4,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,516
of 210,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#32
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,077 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.