↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
bluesky
2 Bluesky users

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The TRaditional versus Early Aggressive Therapy for Multiple Sclerosis (TREAT-MS) trial: design and baseline characteristics of participants
Published in
Contemporary Clinical Trials, October 2025
DOI 10.1016/j.cct.2025.108117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ellen M. Mowry, Peiqing Qian, William Meador, Sharon Lynch, Ram Narayan, Aimee Borazanci, Derrick Robertson, Sara Qureshi, Jennifer Graves, Jason Silversteen, Megan Esch, Leticia Tornes, Claire Riley, Marwa Kaisey, Nancy Sicotte, Siddharama Pawate, Tirisham Gyang, Torge Rempe, Ahmed Z. Obeidat, Geeta Ganesh, Lana Zhovtis Ryerson, Tyler Smith, John Rose, Aaron Carass, Ornusa Chalayon, Mason Kruse-Hoyer, Monilola Salami, Amy Liu, Blake Dewey, Jacob M. Chen, Elizabeth Ogburn, Carolyn Koch, Jerry Prince, Sandra D. Cassard, Scott D. Newsome, for the TREAT-MS Trial Team

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Unknown 7 78%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Unknown 7 78%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2025.
All research outputs
#10,546,025
of 32,948,899 outputs
Outputs from Contemporary Clinical Trials
#676
of 1,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,672
of 357,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Contemporary Clinical Trials
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,948,899 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,884 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.