↓ Skip to main content

Hamiltonian for the Zeros of the Riemann Zeta Function

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review Letters, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
251 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Hamiltonian for the Zeros of the Riemann Zeta Function
Published in
Physical Review Letters, March 2017
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.118.130201
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A Hamiltonian operator H[over ^] is constructed with the property that if the eigenfunctions obey a suitable boundary condition, then the associated eigenvalues correspond to the nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function. The classical limit of H[over ^] is 2xp, which is consistent with the Berry-Keating conjecture. While H[over ^] is not Hermitian in the conventional sense, iH[over ^] is PT symmetric with a broken PT symmetry, thus allowing for the possibility that all eigenvalues of H[over ^] are real. A heuristic analysis is presented for the construction of the metric operator to define an inner-product space, on which the Hamiltonian is Hermitian. If the analysis presented here can be made rigorous to show that H[over ^] is manifestly self-adjoint, then this implies that the Riemann hypothesis holds true.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 293 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 239 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 31%
Researcher 52 21%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Student > Master 16 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 5%
Other 45 18%
Unknown 28 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 153 61%
Mathematics 20 8%
Computer Science 7 3%
Chemistry 7 3%
Engineering 7 3%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 35 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 339. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2026.
All research outputs
#123,036
of 34,545,128 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#173
of 51,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,367
of 353,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#3
of 555 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,545,128 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 51,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 555 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.