↓ Skip to main content

Antiretroviral Therapy for Prevention of HIV Transmission in HIV-Discordant Couples

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
240 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Antiretroviral Therapy for Prevention of HIV Transmission in HIV-Discordant Couples
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, October 2013
DOI 10.1001/jama.2013.278328
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

CLINICAL QUESTION Does treating the HIV-infected partner in a serodiscordant couple reduce the risk of HIV transmission to the uninfected partner? BOTTOM LINE Compared with serodiscordant couples without treatment, couples in which the infected partner is treated with antiretroviral therapy have a lower risk of HIV transmission.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 229 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 17%
Researcher 35 15%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Other 16 7%
Other 37 15%
Unknown 36 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 104 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 12%
Social Sciences 16 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 5%
Psychology 9 4%
Other 28 12%
Unknown 43 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2017.
All research outputs
#4,542,695
of 34,566,597 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#19,659
of 42,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,473
of 259,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#168
of 341 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,566,597 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 73.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 341 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.