↓ Skip to main content

Expression profile of host restriction factors in HIV-1 elite controllers

Overview of attention for article published in Retrovirology, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Expression profile of host restriction factors in HIV-1 elite controllers
Published in
Retrovirology, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1742-4690-10-106
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Several host-encoded antiviral factors suppress HIV-1 replication in a cell-autonomous fashion in vitro. The relevance of these defenses to the control of HIV-1 in vivo remains to be elucidated. We hypothesized that cellular restriction of HIV-1 replication plays a significant role in the observed suppression of HIV-1 in "elite controllers", individuals who maintain undetectable levels of viremia in the absence of antiretroviral therapy (ART). We comprehensively compared the expression levels of 34 host restriction factors and cellular activation levels in CD4+ T cells and sorted T cell subsets between elite controllers, HIV-1-infected (untreated) non-controllers, ART-suppressed, and uninfected individuals.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 139 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 29%
Student > Bachelor 22 15%
Researcher 21 15%
Student > Master 13 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 8%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 12 8%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 19 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 15 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2013.
All research outputs
#21,834,703
of 27,627,301 outputs
Outputs from Retrovirology
#1,022
of 1,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,778
of 228,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Retrovirology
#32
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,627,301 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.