↓ Skip to main content

Optimisation of the enzyme-based determination of hydrogen peroxide using the quartz crystal microbalance

Overview of attention for article published in Biosensors & Bioelectronics, September 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
8 patents

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Optimisation of the enzyme-based determination of hydrogen peroxide using the quartz crystal microbalance
Published in
Biosensors & Bioelectronics, September 2002
DOI 10.1016/s0956-5663(02)00057-x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The benzidines, 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (DAB), 3,3'-dimethoxybenzidine (DMOB) and 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) were enzymatically oxidised to detect hydrogen peroxide, using the quartz crystal. The oxidised product mainly remains in suspension, resulting in a limited quartz sensor signal. We have used two non-ionic surfactants, Tween 80 and Triton X-100 to interact with the oxidised amphiphilic products to increase their solubility and surface activity, and their ability to adsorb to the crystal surface. Tween 80 exhibits optimised response effects for DAB, DMOB and TMB at 0.012, 0.005, and 0.002% (v/v), respectively, whereas Triton X-100 is optimum at 0.1, 0.2, and 0.006% (v/v), respectively. As a result, we have improved the quartz crystal sensor sensitivity to peroxide. The use of Triton X-100 gave an improved response time.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Researcher 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 33%
Chemistry 3 33%
Materials Science 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,581,585
of 34,358,242 outputs
Outputs from Biosensors & Bioelectronics
#2,073
of 9,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,296
of 73,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biosensors & Bioelectronics
#8
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,358,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 73,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.