↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of mid-level feature coding approaches and pooling strategies in visual concept detection

Overview of attention for article published in Computer Vision & Image Understanding, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Comparison of mid-level feature coding approaches and pooling strategies in visual concept detection
Published in
Computer Vision & Image Understanding, May 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.cviu.2012.10.010
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 1 2%
Singapore 1 2%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 2%
France 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 47 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 42%
Student > Master 8 15%
Researcher 7 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 38 72%
Engineering 6 11%
Mathematics 2 4%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 4 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2025.
All research outputs
#12,343,598
of 34,358,242 outputs
Outputs from Computer Vision & Image Understanding
#577
of 1,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,212
of 237,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computer Vision & Image Understanding
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,358,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.