↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Performance study of cementitious systems containing zeolite and silica fume: effects of four metal nitrates on the setting time, strength and leaching characteristics
Published in
Journal of Hazardous Materials, July 2002
DOI 10.1016/s0304-3894(02)00005-5
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of four metal nitrate contaminants, namely chromium, manganese, lead and zinc on the mechanical and leaching characteristics of cement-based materials. For this purpose, three different matrices made of: (i) Portland cement, (ii) Portland cement and silica fume, and (iii) Portland cement and natural zeolite were studied. The effects of metals on the stabilised/solidified (S/S) product characteristics were monitored by measuring: (i) setting time, (ii) compressive strength, (iii) acid neutralisation capacity (ANC), and (iv) solubility of the metal contaminants as a function of pH. The results of both mechanical and leaching tests showed the importance of the contaminant/matrix couple considered. Setting time was accelerated in presence of chromium, while in presence of manganese, lead and zinc it was delayed. However, for the last two contaminants, a 10% replacement of cement by silica fume and zeolite, markedly accelerated the setting time compared to the cement-only matrix. Although the early strength development was adversely affected in presence of all four contaminants, the long-term strength was less affected compared to the control materials. Although the ANC of the materials was not markedly affected by the presence of contaminants, the nature of the matrix did modify the ANC behaviour of the solidified materials. The increased strength and reduced ANC observed in the presence of silica fume are both due to pozzolanic reaction. The type of matrix used for solidification did not affect the solubility of the four metal contaminants. Overall, the results showed that the use of blended cements must be carried out with care and the performance assessment of waste-containing cement-based materials must take into consideration both the mechanical and leaching characteristics of the systems.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 24%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 9 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 14 33%
Materials Science 6 14%
Chemical Engineering 2 5%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Chemistry 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 14 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2013.
All research outputs
#9,515,738
of 27,782,313 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hazardous Materials
#2,121
of 8,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,057
of 53,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hazardous Materials
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,782,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them