↓ Skip to main content

2016 RAD-AID Conference on International Radiology for Developing Countries: Gaps, Growth, and United Nations Sustainable Development Goals

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American College of Radiology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
2016 RAD-AID Conference on International Radiology for Developing Countries: Gaps, Growth, and United Nations Sustainable Development Goals
Published in
Journal of the American College of Radiology, March 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.049
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel J. Mollura, Garshasb Soroosh, Melissa P. Culp, RAD-AID Conference Writing Group, Sarah Averill, David Axelrod, Aparna Baheti, Gillian Battino, Krystal Buchanan, Juliana Bueno, Melissa P. Culp, Farouk Dako, Elise Desperito, Patricia DuCharme, Mai Elezaby, Adriana Faulkner, Kenedy Foryoung, Brian Garra, Dale Gerus, Munir Ghesani, Tariq Gill, Vincent Hewlett, Jean Jeudy, Thomas A. Kenyon, Andrew Kesselman, Connor Louden, Jonathan Mazal, Lindsey Minshew, Natasha Monchil, Michael Morris, Daniel J. Mollura, Cheri Nijssen-Jordan, Harvey L. Nisenbaum, Bart Pierce, Richard Pitcher, Erica Pollack, Janet Pollard, Seth Quansah, Michael Reiter, Babak Saboury, Lauren Saling, Berndt Schmit, Matthew Schwartz, Robin Sobolewski, Gary Soroosh, Veleda Stephens, Amit Sura, Petal Surujpaul, Eva Tutone, Gary Whitlock, Michael Yannes, Marianna Zagurovskaya

Abstract

The 2016 RAD-AID Conference analyzed the accelerated global activity in the radiology community that is transforming medical imaging into an effective spearhead of health care capacity building in low- and middle-income countries. Global health efforts historically emphasized disaster response, crisis zones, and infectious disease outbreaks. However, the projected doubling of cancer and cardiovascular deaths in developing countries in the next 15 years and the need for higher technology screening and diagnostic technologies in low-resource regions, as articulated by the United Nations' new Sustainable Development Goals of 2016, is heightening the role of radiology in global health. Academic US-based radiology programs with RAD-AID chapters achieved a threefold increase in global health project offerings for trainees in the past 5 years. RAD-AID's nonprofit radiology volunteer corps continue to grow by more than 40% yearly, with a volunteer base of 5,750 radiology professionals, serving in 23 countries, donating close to 20,000 pro bono hours globally in 2016. As a high-technology specialty interfacing with nearly all medical and surgical disciplines, radiology underpins vital health technology infrastructure, such as digital imaging archives, electronic medical records, and advanced diagnosis and treatment, essential for long-term future health care capacity in underserved areas of the world.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 184 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 10%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 8%
Researcher 14 8%
Other 12 7%
Other 38 21%
Unknown 70 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 13%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Engineering 8 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 4%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 78 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,010,293
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American College of Radiology
#882
of 3,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,016
of 323,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American College of Radiology
#34
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.