↓ Skip to main content

Barriers to treatment and service utilization in an internet sample of individuals with obsessive–compulsive symptoms

Overview of attention for article published in Depression & Anxiety (1091-4269), April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
reddit
1 Redditor
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Barriers to treatment and service utilization in an internet sample of individuals with obsessive–compulsive symptoms
Published in
Depression & Anxiety (1091-4269), April 2010
DOI 10.1002/da.20694
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Despite the increasing dissemination of treatment for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) in the past decade, the majority of individuals with OCD are not receiving appropriate treatment. This study examined rates of treatment utilization and barriers to treatment in an internet sample of individuals with self-reported OCD.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 204 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 13%
Student > Master 24 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 10%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 66 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 87 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 10%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 2%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 73 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2026.
All research outputs
#1,976,130
of 34,492,055 outputs
Outputs from Depression & Anxiety (1091-4269)
#290
of 1,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,689
of 147,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Depression & Anxiety (1091-4269)
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,492,055 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.