↓ Skip to main content

Computational Approaches and Related Tools to Identify MicroRNAs in a Species: A Bird’s Eye View

Overview of attention for article published in Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Computational Approaches and Related Tools to Identify MicroRNAs in a Species: A Bird’s Eye View
Published in
Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12539-017-0223-x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a family of non-coding RNAs that play a central role in fine-tuning gene expression regulation. Over the past decade, identification and annotation of miRNAs have become a major focus in epigenomics research. However, detection and characterization of miRNA are challenging due to its small size (~22 nucleotide-long) and susceptibility to degradation. The difficulties involved in experimental prediction and characterization of miRNA coding genes have led to the development of in silico-based approaches. Although several algorithms have been developed in recent years, a comprehensive assessment of the principles, methodological insights, and estimate of the strengths and weaknesses of computational methods are limited. The present review is dealt with the detailed methodological insights of different tools used for identifying miRNA coding genes falling under four computational approaches. The parameters considered in these tools along with their specificity are also delineated. Furthermore, the strengths and weaknesses of these four computational approaches, and the bioinformatics resources pertaining to target identification, expression analysis, regulatory network analysis, and SNP identification are stated in this review. The methodological details of miRNA prediction methods and bioinformatics resources related to miRNA research in one platform would facilitate the miRNA research community to develop efficient tools for uncovering novel miRNAs and understanding their role in regulatory networks.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 29%
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Researcher 8 14%
Other 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 18%
Computer Science 8 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 10 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2018.
All research outputs
#13,032,628
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences
#63
of 297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,416
of 308,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 297 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them