Patient Race and Preferred Language Influence the Use of Physical Restraints on Nonintubated Intensive Care Unit Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, November 2025

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

bluesky: 3 Bluesky users

Readers on

mendeley: 4 Mendeley

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Article details
Title	Patient Race and Preferred Language Influence the Use of Physical Restraints on Nonintubated Intensive Care Unit Patients
Published in	Annals of the American Thoracic Society, November 2025
DOI	10.1513/annalsats.202411-1143oc
Pubmed ID	40540644
Authors	Samuel K. McGowan, Hayley B. Gershengorn, Andrew Sudler, Edie Espejo, John Boscardin, Lingsheng Li, Alexander K. Smith, Deepshikha C. Ashana, Karthik Raghunathan, Shannen Kim, Teva Brender, Kristen Vossler, Mary Han, Julien Cobert

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline

Activity

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2025.

All research outputs

#19,419,558

of 29,827,970 outputs

Outputs from Annals of the American Thoracic Society

#2,548

of 3,602 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#121,223

of 316,231 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Annals of the American Thoracic Society

#18

of 66 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 29,827,970 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.

So far Altmetric has tracked 3,602 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.