↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms of adaptive interlimb coordination to sudden ground loss: a neuromusculoskeletal modeling study

Overview of attention for article published in bioRxiv, November 2025
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
bluesky
2 Bluesky users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mechanisms of adaptive interlimb coordination to sudden ground loss: a neuromusculoskeletal modeling study
Published in
bioRxiv, November 2025
DOI 10.1101/2025.11.11.687930
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Mammals exhibit robust walking across diverse environments, a capability largely attributed to central pattern generators (CPGs) in the spinal cord. Afferent feedback modulates CPG output and plays a critical role in adaptive locomotion, yet its specific contributions remain poorly understood. To investigate this, we used a neuromusculoskeletal model to simulate hindlimb locomotion in spinalized cats encountering a hole and experiencing a sudden loss of ground support, as described in prior experimental studies. The model couples a trunk-and-hindlimb musculoskeletal system to a pair of two-level, half-center CPGs-one for each hindlimb. The model reproduced the observed adaptive interlimb coordination that allows cats to maintain walking after the sudden loss of ground support. Notably, the adaptive response emerged without re-optimizing parameters, which were tuned for steady walking in an environment without holes. Nullcline analysis based on dynamical systems theory revealed that afferent feedback mechanisms controlling the transitions between fast and slow neuronal dynamics facilitated adaptive interlimb coordination. These findings provide mechanistic insight into how spinal feedback circuits support robust locomotion through dynamic interactions between the nervous system, the musculoskeletal system, and the environment.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2025.
All research outputs
#26,061,213
of 32,572,863 outputs
Outputs from bioRxiv
#9,085
of 13,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,247
of 348,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from bioRxiv
#4,802
of 7,010 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,572,863 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,251 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7,010 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.