↓ Skip to main content

Religion, Self-Regulation, and Self-Control: Associations, Explanations, and Implications

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Bulletin, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
20 X users
reddit
11 Redditors
video
3 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
1237 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Religion, Self-Regulation, and Self-Control: Associations, Explanations, and Implications
Published in
Psychological Bulletin, January 2009
DOI 10.1037/a0014213
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Many of the links of religiousness with health, well-being, and social behavior may be due to religion's influences on self-control or self-regulation. Using Carver and Scheier's (1998) theory of self-regulation as a framework for organizing the empirical research, the authors review evidence relevant to 6 propositions: (a) that religion can promote self-control; (b) that religion influences how goals are selected, pursued, and organized; (c) that religion facilitates self-monitoring; (d) that religion fosters the development of self-regulatory strength; (e) that religion prescribes and fosters proficiency in a suite of self-regulatory behaviors; and (f) that some of religion's influences on health, well-being, and social behavior may result from religion's influences on self-control and self-regulation. The authors conclude with suggestions for future research.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 29 2%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Other 8 <1%
Unknown 1179 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 197 16%
Student > Master 114 9%
Student > Bachelor 113 9%
Researcher 78 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 77 6%
Other 259 21%
Unknown 399 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 433 35%
Social Sciences 114 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 77 6%
Arts and Humanities 33 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 31 3%
Other 126 10%
Unknown 423 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2025.
All research outputs
#1,562,997
of 34,744,439 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Bulletin
#613
of 2,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,791
of 252,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Bulletin
#15
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,744,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.