↓ Skip to main content

2016 JOSPT Awards: Additive Effects and Biological Mechanisms of Interventions Offer Important Insights.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
2016 JOSPT Awards: Additive Effects and Biological Mechanisms of Interventions Offer Important Insights.
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, April 2017
DOI 10.2519/jospt.2017.0104
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

During the American Physical Therapy Association's Combined Sections Meeting in San Antonio, TX in February 2017, JOSPT recognized the authors of the most outstanding research and clinical practice manuscripts published in JOSPT during 2016. The 2016 JOSPT Excellence in Research Award was presented to Carol A. Courtney, Alana D. Steffen, César Fernández-de-las-Peñas, John Kim, and Samuel J. Chmell, MD, for their March 2016 article "Joint Mobilization Enhances Mechanisms of Conditioned Pain Modulation in Individuals With Osteoarthritis of the Knee." The 2016 George J. Davies-James A. Gould Excellence in Clinical Inquiry Award was presented to Seyda Toprak Celenay, Turkan Akbayrak, and Derya Ozer Kaya for their February 2016 article "A Comparison of the Effects of Stabilization Exercises Plus Manual Therapy to Those of Stabilization Exercises Alone in Patients With Nonspecific Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial." J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017;47(4):225-227. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.0104.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 29 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 12 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 15%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 37 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2017.
All research outputs
#27,764,246
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#2,453
of 2,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,050
of 353,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#35
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,750 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.