↓ Skip to main content

Chiropractic Use and Changes in Health Among Older Medicare Beneficiaries: A Comparative Effectiveness Observational Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Chiropractic Use and Changes in Health Among Older Medicare Beneficiaries: A Comparative Effectiveness Observational Study
Published in
Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics, October 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.08.008
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of chiropractic on 5 outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries: increased difficulties performing activities of daily living (ADLs), instrumental ADLs (IADLs), and lower body functions, as well as lower self-rated health and increased depressive symptoms.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 83 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Other 8 9%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 20 23%
Unknown 25 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 22%
Psychology 5 6%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 27 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2015.
All research outputs
#12,359,716
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics
#671
of 1,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,328
of 260,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics
#11
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.