↓ Skip to main content

Topographic Representation of an Occluded Object and the Effects of Spatiotemporal Context in Human Early Visual Areas

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroscience, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Topographic Representation of an Occluded Object and the Effects of Spatiotemporal Context in Human Early Visual Areas
Published in
Journal of Neuroscience, October 2013
DOI 10.1523/jneurosci.1455-12.2013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiroshi Ban, Hiroki Yamamoto, Takashi Hanakawa, Shin-ichi Urayama, Toshihiko Aso, Hidenao Fukuyama, Yoshimichi Ejima

Abstract

Occlusion is a primary challenge facing the visual system in perceiving object shapes in intricate natural scenes. Although behavior, neurophysiological, and modeling studies have shown that occluded portions of objects may be completed at the early stage of visual processing, we have little knowledge on how and where in the human brain the completion is realized. Here, we provide functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) evidence that the occluded portion of an object is indeed represented topographically in human V1 and V2. Specifically, we find the topographic cortical responses corresponding to the invisible object rotation in V1 and V2. Furthermore, by investigating neural responses for the occluded target rotation within precisely defined cortical subregions, we could dissociate the topographic neural representation of the occluded portion from other types of neural processing such as object edge processing. We further demonstrate that the early topographic representation in V1 can be modulated by prior knowledge of a whole appearance of an object obtained before partial occlusion. These findings suggest that primary "visual" area V1 has the ability to process not only visible or virtually (illusorily) perceived objects but also "invisible" portions of objects without concurrent visual sensation such as luminance enhancement to these portions. The results also suggest that low-level image features and higher preceding cognitive context are integrated into a unified topographic representation of occluded portion in early areas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 95 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 25%
Researcher 20 20%
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Professor 5 5%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 11 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 35 34%
Neuroscience 24 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Computer Science 5 5%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 13 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2020.
All research outputs
#12,825,636
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#16,154
of 23,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,189
of 212,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#184
of 337 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 337 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.