↓ Skip to main content

Use of Herbs Among Adults Based on Evidence-Based Indications: Findings From the National Health Interview Survey

Overview of attention for article published in Mayo Clinic Proceedings, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Use of Herbs Among Adults Based on Evidence-Based Indications: Findings From the National Health Interview Survey
Published in
Mayo Clinic Proceedings, May 2007
DOI 10.4065/82.5.561
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To examine the extent to which US adults use herbs (herbal supplements) in accordance with evidence-based indications. The Alternative Health supplement of the 2002 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) is part of an annual, nationally representative survey of US adults. It contains data on adults' use of the 10 herbs most commonly taken to treat a specific health condition in the past year (January 1 to December 31, 2002). The Natural Standard database was used to formulate evidence-based standards for herb use. These standards were applied to the NHIS data to identify groups of people who used herbs appropriately and inappropriately, using a multivariable logistic regression model. Of the 30,617 adults surveyed, 5787 (18.9%) consumed herbs in the past 12 months; of those, 3315 (57.3%) used herbs to treat a specific health condition. Among people who used only 1 herb (except echinacea and ginseng), approximately one third used it consonant with evidence-based indications. Women and people with a college education were more likely to use herbs (with the exception of echinacea) concordant with scientific evidence. Adults younger than 60 years and black adults were significantly less likely to use herbs (with the exception of echinacea) based on evidentiary referents than their counterparts. However, for echinacea users, no significant differences were detected. Roughly two thirds of adults using commonly consumed herbs (except echinacea) did not do so in accordance with evidence-based indications. Health care professionals should take a proactive role, and public health policies should disseminate evidence-based information regarding consumption of herbal products.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Malaysia 1 1%
India 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 87 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 20%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Master 7 8%
Other 6 7%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 20 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 24 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,182,110
of 28,832,041 outputs
Outputs from Mayo Clinic Proceedings
#1,520
of 5,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,497
of 98,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mayo Clinic Proceedings
#5
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,832,041 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.