↓ Skip to main content

LUCAS compared to manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation is more effective during helicopter rescue—a prospective, randomized, cross-over manikin study

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Emergency Medicine, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
reddit
1 Redditor
guideline
4 clinical guideline sources
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
LUCAS compared to manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation is more effective during helicopter rescue—a prospective, randomized, cross-over manikin study
Published in
American Journal of Emergency Medicine, September 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.07.018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 2 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 162 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 17%
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Master 13 8%
Other 10 6%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 42 25%
Unknown 45 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 18%
Engineering 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 45 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2026.
All research outputs
#1,769,553
of 34,566,597 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Emergency Medicine
#440
of 7,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,436
of 227,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Emergency Medicine
#2
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,566,597 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.