↓ Skip to main content

Reduced mortality with noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring of shock

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Critical Care, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Reduced mortality with noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring of shock
Published in
Journal of Critical Care, September 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.07.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Steven Hata, Corey Stotts, Constance Shelsky, Emine O. Bayman, Anita Frazier, Jenny Wang, Ellen J. Nickel

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 74 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 16 21%
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Master 8 10%
Other 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 77%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 10 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2025.
All research outputs
#10,166,645
of 34,492,055 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Critical Care
#1,335
of 3,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,232
of 150,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Critical Care
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,492,055 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.