↓ Skip to main content

Managing Uncertainty by Certainty: Japanese IVF Users’ Decision-Making Frameworks for Treatment Accessibility and Reliability

Overview of attention for article published in Women's Reproductive Health, November 2025
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Managing Uncertainty by Certainty: Japanese IVF Users’ Decision-Making Frameworks for Treatment Accessibility and Reliability
Published in
Women's Reproductive Health, November 2025
DOI 10.1080/23293691.2025.2574430
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2025.
All research outputs
#24,538,874
of 29,851,553 outputs
Outputs from Women's Reproductive Health
#124
of 182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,429
of 309,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Women's Reproductive Health
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,851,553 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.