↓ Skip to main content

Personality disorder and alcohol treatment outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Psychiatry, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
24 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Personality disorder and alcohol treatment outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
British Journal of Psychiatry, January 2018
DOI 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.194720
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

BackgroundPersonality disorders commonly coexist with alcohol use disorders (AUDs), but there is conflicting evidence on their association with treatment outcomes.AimsTo determine the size and direction of the association between personality disorder and the outcome of treatment for AUD.MethodWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials and longitudinal studies.ResultsPersonality disorders were associated with more alcohol-related impairment at baseline and less retention in treatment. However, during follow-up people with a personality disorder showed a similar amount of improvement in alcohol outcomes to that of people without such disorder. Synthesis of evidence was hampered by variable outcome reporting and a low quality of evidence overall.ConclusionsCurrent evidence suggests the pessimism about treatment outcomes for this group of patients may be unfounded. However, there is an urgent need for more consistent and better quality reporting of outcomes in future studies in this area.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Master 7 7%
Other 21 21%
Unknown 30 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 31 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,574,080
of 27,458,340 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Psychiatry
#862
of 6,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,052
of 457,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Psychiatry
#614
of 5,505 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,458,340 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,505 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.