↓ Skip to main content

Diversity and Epidemiology of Mokola Virus

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Diversity and Epidemiology of Mokola Virus
Published in
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, October 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002511
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Mokola virus (MOKV) appears to be exclusive to Africa. Although the first isolates were from Nigeria and other Congo basin countries, all reports over the past 20 years have been from southern Africa. Previous phylogenetic studies analyzed few isolates or used partial gene sequence for analysis since limited sequence information is available for MOKV and the isolates were distributed among various laboratories. The complete nucleoprotein, phosphoprotein, matrix and glycoprotein genes of 18 MOKV isolates in various laboratories were sequenced either using partial or full genome sequencing using pyrosequencing and a phylogenetic analysis was undertaken. The results indicated that MOKV isolates from the Republic of South Africa, Zimbabwe, Central African Republic and Nigeria clustered according to geographic origin irrespective of the genes used for phylogenetic analysis, similar to that observed with Lagos bat virus. A Bayesian Markov-Chain-Monte-Carlo- (MCMC) analysis revealed the age of the most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of MOKV to be between 279 and 2034 years depending on the genes used. Generally, all MOKV isolates showed a similar pattern at the amino acid sites considered influential for viral properties.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Nigeria 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Cameroon 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 69 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 23%
Student > Master 13 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 16 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 17%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 21 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2023.
All research outputs
#8,884,464
of 27,778,980 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#4,960
of 10,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,579
of 229,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#78
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,778,980 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.