↓ Skip to main content

Reversible Chirality Control in Peptide-Functionalized Gold Nanoparticles

Overview of attention for article published in ACS Nano, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Reversible Chirality Control in Peptide-Functionalized Gold Nanoparticles
Published in
ACS Nano, October 2013
DOI 10.1021/nn403816a
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We report the induction of chiroptical properties in 2 nm diameter gold nanoparticles passivated with short peptides characterized by the Aib-l-Ala repetition in their sequence. The nanoparticles present relevant ECD signals in the 300-650 nm wavelength region, corresponding to the gold nanoparticle's quantized electronic structure. Although the only chiral amino acid present in the peptide sequences is l-Ala, the particles show mirror image spectra like those of enantiomers according to the number of amino acids in the main chain (odd or even). Such a behavior appears to be strongly influenced by the secondary structure assumed by the peptides when passivating the nanoparticles and vanishes when the sequence is long enough to assume a 310-helix conformation. Moreover, chirality control is a reversible process and can be deactivated or reactivated by increasing or decreasing the temperature.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
India 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 44 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 30%
Researcher 10 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Professor 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 29 62%
Materials Science 6 13%
Chemical Engineering 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 4 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2013.
All research outputs
#15,207,446
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from ACS Nano
#9,882
of 13,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,217
of 216,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACS Nano
#186
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.