↓ Skip to main content

Social influences on mammalian circadian rhythms: animal and human studies

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Reviews, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
404 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Social influences on mammalian circadian rhythms: animal and human studies
Published in
Biological Reviews, March 2007
DOI 10.1017/s1464793103006353
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 404 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 387 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 18%
Student > Bachelor 60 15%
Researcher 57 14%
Student > Master 34 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 6%
Other 67 17%
Unknown 89 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 114 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 10%
Psychology 42 10%
Neuroscience 33 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 4%
Other 56 14%
Unknown 101 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2025.
All research outputs
#1,111,697
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Biological Reviews
#273
of 1,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,116
of 125,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Reviews
#15
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,888 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.