↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Irrigated Taro (Colocasia esculenta) in the Indo‐Pacific: Biological, Social and Historical Perspectives Edited by Matthew Spriggs , David Addison and Peter J. Matthews Senri Ethnological Studies 78. National Museum of Ethnology, Osaka, 2012. ISSN 0387‐6004; ISBN 978‐4‐901906‐93‐7 C3039. Free copies may be requested for educational and research purposes ([email protected])
Published in
Archaeology in Oceania, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/arco.5011
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2013.
All research outputs
#22,690,735
of 27,774,969 outputs
Outputs from Archaeology in Oceania
#207
of 252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,151
of 215,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeology in Oceania
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,774,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.