↓ Skip to main content

Loss of p63 Expression Is Associated with Tumor Progression in Bladder Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Pathology, October 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Loss of p63 Expression Is Associated with Tumor Progression in Bladder Cancer
Published in
American Journal of Pathology, October 2002
DOI 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)64396-9
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

p63, a member of the p53 gene family, encodes multiple proteins that may either transactivate p53 responsive genes (TAp63) or act as a dominant-negative factor toward p53 and p73 (Delta Np63). p63 is expressed in many epithelial compartments and p63(-/-) mice fail to develop skin, prostate, and mammary glands among other defects. It has been previously shown that p63 is expressed in normal urothelium. This study reports that p63 is regulated in bladder carcinogenesis and that p63 expression is lost in most invasive cancers whereas papillary superficial tumors maintain p63 expression. Examination of bladder carcinoma cell lines reveals that certain lines derived from invasive carcinomas maintain expression of Delta Np63, as demonstrated by both immunoblotting and confirmed by isoform-specific quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Another novel finding reported in this study is the fact that p63(-/-) mice develop a bladder mucosa epithelial layer yet fail to complete uroepithelial differentiation, producing a nontransitional default cuboidal epithelium. These data indicate that in contrast to the skin and prostate, p63 is not required for formation of a bladder epithelium but is indispensable for the specific differentiation of a transitional urothelium.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Unknown 90 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 16 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 24%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 17 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2017.
All research outputs
#12,345,171
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Pathology
#4,548
of 9,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,345
of 71,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Pathology
#44
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.