↓ Skip to main content

Vascular Leiomyosarcoma Masquerading as Chronic Deep Venous Thrombosis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Nuclear Medicine, December 2025
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Vascular Leiomyosarcoma Masquerading as Chronic Deep Venous Thrombosis
Published in
Clinical Nuclear Medicine, December 2025
DOI 10.1097/rlu.0000000000006240
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2025.
All research outputs
#20,887,367
of 29,950,333 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Nuclear Medicine
#2,098
of 5,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,622
of 221,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Nuclear Medicine
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,950,333 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,719 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.