↓ Skip to main content

A first-principles study of RuClF/AlN van der Waals heterostructure for potential use as anode for lithium-ion batteries

Overview of attention for article published in New Journal of Chemistry, January 2026
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A first-principles study of RuClF/AlN van der Waals heterostructure for potential use as anode for lithium-ion batteries
Published in
New Journal of Chemistry, January 2026
DOI 10.1039/d5nj04360c
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2026.
All research outputs
#26,727,771
of 32,346,385 outputs
Outputs from New Journal of Chemistry
#5,238
of 7,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,340
of 351,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Journal of Chemistry
#207
of 274 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,346,385 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,885 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 274 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.