↓ Skip to main content

New Technologies for Detection of Enteric Parasites

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Parasitology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
New Technologies for Detection of Enteric Parasites
Published in
Trends in Parasitology, April 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.pt.2017.03.005
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Enteric parasites are major contributors to the global diarrhoeal disease load, infecting >67.2 million people. Their prevalence and clinical impact, however, are underestimated due to lack of adequate detection, which is largely still based on microscopy, particularly in developing countries. New commercially available enteric panel assays, which detect parasites (as well as bacteria and/or viruses) using multiplex PCR, offer enhanced sensitivity and specificity as well as the ability to detect mixed infections, and will play an important role in epidemiological surveillance and outbreak investigations. A major limitation of these technologies, however, particularly for developing countries, is the costs involved. Emerging technologies for low-resource, point-of-care (POC) settings have the potential to dramatically improve the cost and accuracy of enteric parasite detection in the future.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 214 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 11%
Researcher 22 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 4%
Other 34 16%
Unknown 79 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 22 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 83 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2026.
All research outputs
#1,851,798
of 34,240,563 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Parasitology
#184
of 2,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,212
of 353,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Parasitology
#6
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,240,563 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,352 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.