↓ Skip to main content

Clustering of (Un)Healthy Behaviors in Adolescents from Dunedin, New Zealand

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Health Behavior, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Clustering of (Un)Healthy Behaviors in Adolescents from Dunedin, New Zealand
Published in
American Journal of Health Behavior, May 2017
DOI 10.5993/ajhb.41.3.6
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Healthy lifestyle habits set the stage for healthy behaviors in adulthood. We examined clustering of health behaviors (physical activity [PA], screen time, fruit and vegetable [F&V] intake) and weight status in New Zealand adolescents. Adolescents from Dunedin, New Zealand (N = 1300; 49.0% male; 15.3±1.4 years) completed a questionnaire about PA, screen time (TV/computer/video games), and F&V intake. Height and weight were measured. A 2-step cluster analysis was completed. Few adolescents met individual guidelines (17.9% PA, 14.2% screen time, 29.8% F&V intake) and only 2.5% met all 3 guidelines. Weight status was 3.2%/69.6%/20.5%/6.8% for underweight/healthy weight/overweight/obese. Six clusters were identified: (1) non-adherent (not meeting any guideline) adolescents with healthy weight (38.8%); (2) non-adherent with unhealthy weight (15.4%); (3) semi-adherent (meeting some guidelines) with unhealthy weight (11.8%); (4) physically active with healthy weight (13.4%); (5) low screen time with healthy weight (7.1%); and (6) healthy F&V intake with healthy weight (13.5%). Few adolescents met recommended health behavior guidelines; yet, two-thirds had a healthy weight. The identified clusters had distinct sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics. Future interventions should be comprehensive and consider socioeconomic structural factors.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Researcher 5 7%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 22 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 15%
Sports and Recreations 10 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 11%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 28 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2017.
All research outputs
#16,160,852
of 28,021,203 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Health Behavior
#386
of 617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,405
of 331,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Health Behavior
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,021,203 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.