↓ Skip to main content

12-Month Outcomes for Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation: Experience from the Veteran Affairs

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention, November 2025
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
12-Month Outcomes for Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation: Experience from the Veteran Affairs
Published in
Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention, November 2025
DOI 10.1097/hcr.0000000000000979
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To examine 12-month maintenance of physical and psychosocial benefits achieved during the veterans affairs (VA) home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) program. Using a retrospective, observational design, data were collected from 16 HBCR VA sites. Analyses included participants with data on enrollment, program completion, and 12-month follow-up. Changes over time were examined using repeated measures ANOVA. Logistic regression was used to examine the patient's primary referral diagnosis for enrollment and baseline AACVPR risk stratification category, to predict cardiac-related hospitalization and emergency department (ED) visits at 12 months. Of the 572 patients who completed the program, 208 patients (36%) had data at all three time points. Most participants were White males with a mean age of 69.5 ± 8.2 years. Approximately half of the included participants (n = 99) were classified as high risk at enrollment. Over 12 months, several significant improvements were found (P ≤.05), including exercise capacity, depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores and American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation criteria), self-reported cardiac self-efficacy (understanding of managing heart disease), eating habits (Rate Your Plate, Heart Assessment), weight, diastolic blood pressure, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Fourteen percent (n = 30) of participants had one or more cardiac-related ED visits, and 14% (n = 29) of participants had one or more cardiac-related hospitalizations. Home-based models have been proven to be a safe and effective alternative to on-site programs. Our findings demonstrate maintenance of health benefits at 12 months following a home-based model. Future analysis of the HBCR model is necessary to evaluate maintenance improvements in those participants who did not receive additional follow-up appointments.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 18%
Unspecified 1 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 9%
Librarian 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 18%
Unspecified 1 9%
Psychology 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2026.
All research outputs
#28,627,901
of 34,393,205 outputs
Outputs from Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention
#1,003
of 1,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#277,801
of 383,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,393,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.