↓ Skip to main content

Auditory temporal-regularity processing correlates with language and literacy skill in early adulthood

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Neuroscience, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Auditory temporal-regularity processing correlates with language and literacy skill in early adulthood
Published in
Cognitive Neuroscience, September 2013
DOI 10.1080/17588928.2013.825236
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This work tests the hypothesis that language skill depends on the ability to incorporate streams of sound into an accurate temporal framework. We tested the ability of young English-speaking adults to process single time intervals and rhythmic sequences of such intervals, hypothesized to be relevant to the analysis of the temporal structure of language. The data implicate a specific role for the ability to process beat-based temporal regularities in phonological language and literacy skill.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 63 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 24%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Master 8 12%
Lecturer 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 15 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 30%
Neuroscience 9 14%
Linguistics 6 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 17 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2014.
All research outputs
#13,162,991
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Neuroscience
#125
of 237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,381
of 198,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Neuroscience
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.