| Title |
Fear Extinction Causes Target-Specific Remodeling of Perisomatic Inhibitory Synapses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuron, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.047 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stéphanie Trouche, Jennifer M. Sasaki, Tiffany Tu, Leon G. Reijmers |
| Abstract |
A more complete understanding of how fear extinction alters neuronal activity and connectivity within fear circuits may aid in the development of strategies to treat human fear disorders. Using a c-fos-based transgenic mouse, we found that contextual fear extinction silenced basal amygdala (BA) excitatory neurons that had been previously activated during fear conditioning. We hypothesized that the silencing of BA fear neurons was caused by an action of extinction on BA inhibitory synapses. In support of this hypothesis, we found extinction-induced target-specific remodeling of BA perisomatic inhibitory synapses originating from parvalbumin and cholecystokinin-positive interneurons. Interestingly, the predicted changes in the balance of perisomatic inhibition matched the silent and active states of the target BA fear neurons. These observations suggest that target-specific changes in perisomatic inhibitory synapses represent a mechanism through which experience can sculpt the activation patterns within a neural circuit. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Japan | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 2% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 317 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 90 | 26% |
| Researcher | 77 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 14% |
| Unknown | 55 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 116 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 109 | 32% |
| Psychology | 16 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 3% |
| Unknown | 70 | 21% |