↓ Skip to main content

Fear Extinction Causes Target-Specific Remodeling of Perisomatic Inhibitory Synapses

Overview of attention for article published in Neuron, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
patent
4 patents
googleplus
1 Google+ user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
340 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Fear Extinction Causes Target-Specific Remodeling of Perisomatic Inhibitory Synapses
Published in
Neuron, October 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.047
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A more complete understanding of how fear extinction alters neuronal activity and connectivity within fear circuits may aid in the development of strategies to treat human fear disorders. Using a c-fos-based transgenic mouse, we found that contextual fear extinction silenced basal amygdala (BA) excitatory neurons that had been previously activated during fear conditioning. We hypothesized that the silencing of BA fear neurons was caused by an action of extinction on BA inhibitory synapses. In support of this hypothesis, we found extinction-induced target-specific remodeling of BA perisomatic inhibitory synapses originating from parvalbumin and cholecystokinin-positive interneurons. Interestingly, the predicted changes in the balance of perisomatic inhibition matched the silent and active states of the target BA fear neurons. These observations suggest that target-specific changes in perisomatic inhibitory synapses represent a mechanism through which experience can sculpt the activation patterns within a neural circuit.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 340 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
Japan 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 317 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 90 26%
Researcher 77 23%
Student > Master 33 10%
Student > Bachelor 20 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 5%
Other 47 14%
Unknown 55 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 116 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 109 32%
Psychology 16 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Other 9 3%
Unknown 70 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2025.
All research outputs
#617,212
of 28,840,878 outputs
Outputs from Neuron
#996
of 9,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,622
of 233,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuron
#11
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,840,878 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.