↓ Skip to main content

Semiempirical modeling of electrochemical charge transfer

Overview of attention for article published in Faraday Discussions of the Chemical Society, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Semiempirical modeling of electrochemical charge transfer
Published in
Faraday Discussions of the Chemical Society, January 2017
DOI 10.1039/c6fd00234j
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Nanoelectrochemical experiments using detection based on tip enhanced Raman spectroscopy (TERS) show a broad distribution of single-molecule formal potentials E°' for large π-conjugated molecules; theoretical studies are needed to understand the origins of this distribution. In this paper, we present a theoretical approach to determine E°' for electrochemical reactions involving a single molecule interacting with an electrode represented as a metal nanocluster and apply this method to the Ag20-pyridine system. The theory is based on the semiempirical INDO electronic structure approach, together with the COSMO solvation model and an approach for tuning the Fermi energy, in which the silver atomic orbital energies are varied until the ground singlet state of Ag20-pyridine matches the lowest triplet energy, corresponding to electron transfer from the metal cluster to pyridine. Based on this theory, we find that the variation of E°' with the structure of the Ag20-pyridine system is only weakly correlated with changes in either the ground-state interaction energy or the charge-transfer excited-state energies at zero applied potential, which shows the importance of calculations that include an applied potential in determining the variation of formal potential with geometry. Factors which determine E°' include wavefunction overlap for geometries when pyridine is close to the surface, and electrostatics when the molecule-cluster separation is large.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 9 31%
Physics and Astronomy 2 7%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Materials Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 14 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2017.
All research outputs
#28,598,653
of 34,358,242 outputs
Outputs from Faraday Discussions of the Chemical Society
#1,457
of 1,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#367,157
of 462,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Faraday Discussions of the Chemical Society
#99
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,358,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,970 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.