↓ Skip to main content

Hydrogen Peroxide Enhances TGFβ-mediated Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Human Mammary Epithelial MCF-10A Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Anticancer Research: International Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Hydrogen Peroxide Enhances TGFβ-mediated Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Human Mammary Epithelial MCF-10A Cells
Published in
Anticancer Research: International Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment, March 2017
DOI 10.21873/anticanres.11408
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This study investigated the effect of reactive oxygen species (ROS) on transforming growth factor (TGF)-β-mediated epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in order to clarify the influence of ROS and TGFβ on the induction of dysplasia and ultimately, tumorigenesis. Confluent MCF-10A human mammary epithelial cells were treated with H2O2 for 1 h, then reseeded at low density in the presence of TGFβ and cultured until confluence. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, 250 μM) enhanced TGFβ-mediated EMT, as evidenced by increased expression of EMT-associated transcription factors, which was accompanied by increased nuclear localization of phosphorylated SMAD family member 2 (SMAD2) and up-regulation of the TGFβ signaling pathway components mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK). Pharmacological inhibition of MEK/ERK signaling partly reversed the effects of H2O2 Conclusion: H2O2 enhances TGFβ-mediated EMT via SMAD and MEK/ERK signaling.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 6 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 19%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 7 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2017.
All research outputs
#31,191,732
of 34,372,222 outputs
Outputs from Anticancer Research: International Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
#6,843
of 8,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,776
of 368,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anticancer Research: International Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment
#82
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.