↓ Skip to main content

Informed Dynamic Scheduling for QLDPC Codes

Overview of attention for article published in arXiv, January 2026
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

bluesky
3 Bluesky users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Informed Dynamic Scheduling for QLDPC Codes
Published in
arXiv, January 2026
DOI 10.22331/q-2026-01-16-1967
Authors

Tzu-Hsuan Huang, Yeong-Luh Ueng

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2026.
All research outputs
#18,631,185
of 30,064,361 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#315,521
of 1,320,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,166
of 154,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#6,718
of 45,871 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,064,361 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,320,860 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45,871 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.