↓ Skip to main content

Demography of a reintroduced population: moving toward management models for an endangered species, the Whooping Crane

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Applications, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Demography of a reintroduced population: moving toward management models for an endangered species, the Whooping Crane
Published in
Ecological Applications, July 2014
DOI 10.1890/13-0559.1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sabrina Servanty, Sarah J. Converse, Larissa L. Bailey

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 72 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 26%
Researcher 16 22%
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 49%
Environmental Science 21 29%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 1%
Unknown 14 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2020.
All research outputs
#4,354,206
of 24,701,898 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#1,055
of 3,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,125
of 232,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#9
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,701,898 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.