↓ Skip to main content

Regulation of immunopathogenesis during Plasmodium and Toxoplasma infections: more parallels than distinctions?

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Parasitology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Regulation of immunopathogenesis during Plasmodium and Toxoplasma infections: more parallels than distinctions?
Published in
Trends in Parasitology, November 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.pt.2013.10.002
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Toxoplasma and Plasmodium parasites exact a significant toll on public health. Host immunity required for efficient control of infection by these Apicomplexans involves the induction of potent T cell responses, which sometimes results in immunopathological damage. Thus, protective immune responses must be balanced by regulatory networks that limit immunopathology. We review several key cellular and molecular immunoregulatory networks operational during Toxoplasma and Plasmodium infections. Accumulating data show that despite differences in how the immune response controls these parasites, many host immunoregulatory pathways and cellular networks are common to both. Thus, understanding the cellular and molecular circuits that prevent or regulate immunopathological responses against one parasite is likely to inform our understanding of the host response to the other parasite.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Mexico 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 70 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 20%
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Other 5 7%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 30%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 13 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2025.
All research outputs
#3,946,423
of 29,459,207 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Parasitology
#574
of 2,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,343
of 235,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Parasitology
#7
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,459,207 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.