↓ Skip to main content

3D chromatin interactions organize Yan chromatin occupancy and repression at the even-skipped locus

Overview of attention for article published in Genes & Development, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
3D chromatin interactions organize Yan chromatin occupancy and repression at the even-skipped locus
Published in
Genes & Development, November 2013
DOI 10.1101/gad.225789.113
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jemma L. Webber, Jie Zhang, Aaron Mitchell-Dick, Ilaria Rebay

Abstract

Long-range integration of transcriptional inputs is critical for gene expression, yet the mechanisms remain poorly understood. We investigated the molecular determinants that confer fidelity to expression of the heart identity gene even-skipped (eve). Targeted deletion of regions bound by the repressor Yan defined two novel enhancers that contribute repressive inputs to stabilize tissue-specific output from a third enhancer. Deletion of any individual enhancer reduced Yan occupancy at the other elements, impacting eve expression, cell fate specification, and cardiac function. These long-range interactions may be stabilized by three-dimensional chromatin contacts that we detected between the elements. Our work provides a new paradigm for chromatin-level integration of general repressive inputs with specific patterning information to achieve robust gene expression.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 7%
United States 1 4%
Unknown 25 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 54%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 25%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 43%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2013.
All research outputs
#18,345,259
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Genes & Development
#5,624
of 5,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,258
of 215,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genes & Development
#32
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.