↓ Skip to main content

Network module-based model in the differential expression analysis for RNA-seq

Overview of attention for article published in Bioinformatics, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Network module-based model in the differential expression analysis for RNA-seq
Published in
Bioinformatics, April 2017
DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx214
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

RNA-seq has emerged as a powerful technology for the detection of differential gene expression in the transcriptome. The commonly used statistical methods for RNA-seq differential expression analysis were designed for individual genes, which may detect too many irrelevant significantly genes or too few genes to interpret the phenotypic changes. Recently network module-based methods have been proposed as a powerful approach to analyze and interpret expression data in microarray and shotgun proteomics. But the module-based statistical model has not been adequately addressed for RNA-seq data. we proposed a network module-based generalized linear model for differential expression analysis of the count-based sequencing data from RNA-seq. The simulation studies demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed model and the improvement of the statistical power for identifying the differentially expressed modules in comparison to the existing methods. We also applied our method to tissue data sets and identified 207 significantly differentially expressed kidney-active or liver-active modules. For liver cancer data sets, significantly differentially expressed modules, including Wnt signaling pathway and VEGF pathway, were found to be tightly associated with liver cancer. Besides, in comparison with the single gene-level analysis, our method could identify more significantly biological modules, which related to the liver cancer. The R package SeqMADE is available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/SeqMADE/ . [email protected]. Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 27%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Master 6 10%
Other 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 11 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 19%
Computer Science 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 15 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2017.
All research outputs
#3,874,500
of 28,832,041 outputs
Outputs from Bioinformatics
#3,047
of 13,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,495
of 333,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioinformatics
#36
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,832,041 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.