↓ Skip to main content

HIV Medical Providers' Perceptions of the Use of Antiretroviral Therapy as Nonoccupational Postexposure Prophylaxis in 2 Major Metropolitan Areas

Overview of attention for article published in JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
HIV Medical Providers' Perceptions of the Use of Antiretroviral Therapy as Nonoccupational Postexposure Prophylaxis in 2 Major Metropolitan Areas
Published in
JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, November 2013
DOI 10.1097/qai.0b013e3182a901a2
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In 2005, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention expanded its recommendation of postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) use in the workplace to include nonoccupational exposures (nPEP). The availability and extensive use of nPEP have not achieved widespread acceptance among health-care providers of high-risk populations, and public health and primary care agencies have been sparse in their implementation of nPEP promotion, protocols, and practices.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 8 14%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 15 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 16%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 16 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2013.
All research outputs
#21,823,153
of 34,763,505 outputs
Outputs from JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
#4,635
of 6,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,048
of 264,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
#23
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,763,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,094 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.