| Title |
Improving phosphorus efficiency in cereal crops: Is breeding for reduced grain phosphorus concentration part of the solution?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2013.00444 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors | |
| Abstract |
Given the non-renewable nature of global phosphate reserves, there is a push to increase the phosphorus (P) efficiency of agricultural crops. Research has typically focussed on investigating P acquisition efficiency or internal P utilization efficiency to reduce crop fertilizer requirements. A novel option that would reduce the amount of P exported from fields at harvest, and may ultimately reduce P fertilizer requirements, would be to reduce the amount of P translocated to grains to minimize grain P concentrations. While such a trait has been mentioned in a number of studies over the years, there has not been a concerted effort to target this trait in breeding programs. In this perspective piece we explore the reasons why a low grain P trait has not been pursued, and discuss the potential benefits and drawbacks of such a trait in the context of breeding to improve the P efficiency of cropping systems. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 123 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 19% |
| Researcher | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 30 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 69 | 53% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 35 | 27% |