↓ Skip to main content

Food for Thought: Hormonal, Experiential, and Neural Influences on Feeding and Obesity

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroscience, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Food for Thought: Hormonal, Experiential, and Neural Influences on Feeding and Obesity
Published in
Journal of Neuroscience, November 2013
DOI 10.1523/jneurosci.3452-13.2013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Canada 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 149 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 27%
Researcher 22 14%
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 29 18%
Unknown 18 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 15%
Neuroscience 22 14%
Psychology 18 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 6%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 27 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2014.
All research outputs
#24,121,174
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#18,577
of 23,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,048
of 265,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#220
of 305 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 305 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.