↓ Skip to main content

LC/MS study of the UV filter hexyl 2‐[4‐(diethylamino)‐2‐hydroxybenzoyl]‐benzoate (DHHB) aquatic chlorination with sodium hypochlorite

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Mass Spectrometry, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
LC/MS study of the UV filter hexyl 2‐[4‐(diethylamino)‐2‐hydroxybenzoyl]‐benzoate (DHHB) aquatic chlorination with sodium hypochlorite
Published in
Journal of Mass Spectrometry, November 2013
DOI 10.1002/jms.3286
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Grbović, P. Trebše, D. Dolenc, A. T. Lebedev, M. Sarakha

Abstract

The fate of modern personal care products in the environment is becoming a matter of increasing concern because of the growing production and assortment of these compounds. More and more chemicals of this class are treated as emerging contaminants. Transformation of commercially available products in the environment may result in the formation of a wide array of their metabolites. Personal care products in swimming pools and in drinking water reservoirs may undergo oxidation or chlorination. There is much data on the formation of more toxic metabolites from original low toxicity commercial products. Therefore, reliable identification of all possible transformation products and a thorough study of their physicochemical and biological properties are of high priority. The present study deals with the identification of the products of the aquatic chlorination of the hexyl 2-[4-(diethylamino)-2-hydroxybenzoyl]-benzoate ultraviolet filter. High-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS) and HPLC/MS/MS with accurate mass measurements were used for this purpose. As a result, three chlorinated transformation products were identified.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 26%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 11 28%
Environmental Science 7 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2013.
All research outputs
#22,074,210
of 24,629,540 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mass Spectrometry
#2,202
of 2,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,985
of 221,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mass Spectrometry
#20
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,629,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,603 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.