↓ Skip to main content

素足で踊る舞踊のための身体運動の技術としての「回転」

Overview of attention for article published in Choreologia, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
素足で踊る舞踊のための身体運動の技術としての「回転」
Published in
Choreologia, April 2010
DOI 10.11235/buyougaku1978.1998.50
Authors

堀切 敍子

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2017.
All research outputs
#15,175,718
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Choreologia
#8
of 36 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,399
of 103,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Choreologia
#5
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one scored the same or higher as 28 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.