↓ Skip to main content

Cannabis use and age at onset of symptoms in subjects at clinical high risk for psychosis

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cannabis use and age at onset of symptoms in subjects at clinical high risk for psychosis
Published in
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, August 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2011.01763.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Numerous studies have found a robust association between cannabis use and the onset of psychosis. Nevertheless, the relationship between cannabis use and the onset of early (or, in retrospect, prodromal) symptoms of psychosis remains unclear. The study focused on investigating the relationship between cannabis use and early and high-risk symptoms in subjects at clinical high risk for psychosis.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Unknown 184 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 15%
Researcher 27 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 14%
Student > Master 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 42 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 27%
Psychology 45 24%
Neuroscience 9 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 51 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,944,174
of 31,970,964 outputs
Outputs from Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
#525
of 3,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,500
of 160,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,970,964 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.