↓ Skip to main content

Oral bioavailability of P‐glycoprotein substrate drugs do not differ between ABCB1‐1Δ and ABCB1 wild type dogs

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Oral bioavailability of P‐glycoprotein substrate drugs do not differ between ABCB1‐1Δ and ABCB1 wild type dogs
Published in
Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, September 2010
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2010.01170.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Previous studies have indicated that intestinal P-glycoprotein (P-gp) limits the oral bioavailability of substrate drugs and alters systemic pharmacokinetics. In this study, dogs lacking functional P-gp were used to determine the contribution of P-gp to the oral bioavailability and systemic pharmacokinetics of several P-gp substrate drugs. The P-gp substrates quinidine, loperamide, nelfinavir, cyclosporin and the control (non P-gp substrate) drug diazepam were individually administered intravenously and per os to ABCB1-1Δ dogs, which have a P-gp null phenotype and ABCB1 wildtype dogs. ABCB1-1Δ dogs have been shown to have greater brain penetration of P-gp substrates, but limited information is available regarding oral bioavailability of P-gp substrate drugs in this animal model. Plasma drug concentration vs. time curves were generated and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated for each drug. There were no differences in oral bioavailability between ABCB1-1Δ dogs and ABCB1 wildtype dogs for any of the drugs studied, suggesting that intestinal P-gp does not significantly affect intestinal absorption of these particular substrate drugs in ABCB1-1Δ dogs. However, small sample sizes and individual variability in CYP enzyme activity may have affected the power of the study to detect the impact of P-gp on oral bioavailability.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 54 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Other 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Researcher 4 7%
Professor 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 27 48%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 18%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Philosophy 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 29 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2014.
All research outputs
#27,726,607
of 34,360,257 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#608
of 1,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,900
of 152,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#11
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,257 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,018 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.