↓ Skip to main content

Routine scale and polish for periodontal health in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
17 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
3 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Routine scale and polish for periodontal health in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004625.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Many dentists or hygienists provide scaling and polishing for patients at regular intervals, even if those patients are considered to be at low risk of developing periodontal disease. There is debate over the clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of 'routine scaling and polishing' and the 'optimal' frequency at which it should be provided for healthy adults.A 'routine scale and polish' treatment is defined as scaling or polishing or both of the crown and root surfaces of teeth to remove local irritational factors (plaque, calculus, debris and staining), that does not involve periodontal surgery or any form of adjunctive periodontal therapy such as the use of chemotherapeutic agents or root planing.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 149 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Researcher 12 8%
Other 32 21%
Unknown 36 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Psychology 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 40 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2025.
All research outputs
#1,302,522
of 34,590,055 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,468
of 14,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,038
of 265,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,590,055 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.