Overview of attention for article published in Conference Proceedings 1998 International Conference on Indium Phosphide and Related Materials (Cat No98CH36129), January 1999
Altmetric Badge
About this Attention Score
One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 110)
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Login
to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login
to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2025.
All research outputs
#7,336,887
of 33,825,399 outputs
Outputs from Conference Proceedings 1998 International Conference on Indium Phosphide and Related Materials (Cat No98CH36129)
#5
of 110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,255
of 152,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conference Proceedings 1998 International Conference on Indium Phosphide and Related Materials (Cat No98CH36129)
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,825,399 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 110 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
